• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

Bloomburg - Oh, it’s Big Brother, Get use to it

carbinemike

Global Moderator
Staff member
Global Moderator
"Philanthropist"
This filming of everything is yet another respsonse to a tragedy, in this case 9/11, that had nothing to do with preventing that act of evil. 9/11 was the excuse to trample on people just as Sandy Hook is. Don't waste a crisis!

Big Brother is watching. Now get used to it!

Envisioning a future where privacy is a thing of the past, Mayor Bloomberg said Friday it will soon be impossible to escape the watchful eyes of surveillance cameras and even drones in the city.

He acknowledged privacy concerns, but said “you can’t keep the tides from coming in.”

“You wait, in five years, the technology is getting better, they’ll be cameras everyplace . . . whether you like it or not,” Bloomberg said.

The security measures have drawn scorn from some civil libertarians — but Bloomberg scoffed at privacy concerns on his Friday morning program on WOR-AM.

“The argument against using automation is just this craziness that 'Oh, it’s Big Brother,’” Bloomberg said. “Get used to it!”

The New York Civil Liberties Union has documented nearly 2,400 surveillance cameras fixed on public spaces in Manhattan alone. Many are operated by the police, others by poroperty owners.

In Lower Manhattan, an initiative developed after 9/11 known as the “Ring of Steel” integrates the NYPD’s cameras with those of banks and other institutions.

But in the future, the cameras won't just be planted on buildings and utility poles. Some of them will be able to fly, the mayor pointed out.

“It’s scary,” Bloomberg said. “But what’s the difference whether the drone is up in the air or on the building? I mean intellectually I have trouble making a distinction. And you know you're gonna have face recognition software. People are working on that.”

Bloomberg warned that drones would be able to peep into private residences - but that Peeping Tom legislation could help maintain some privacy.

“It's just we’re going into a different world, unchartered,” he said.

“We're going to have more visibility and less privacy. I don't see how you stop that. And it's not a question of whether I think it's good or bad. I just don't see how you could stop that because we're going to have them.”
 
That jack-ass can answer his own question by saying "we won't do it." That would stop it, but no, he doesn't give a crap about anyone or anything. Maybe one of his one will turn on him...we can only hope...
 
OhioArcher said:
That jack-ass can answer his own question by saying "we won't do it." That would stop it, but no, he doesn't give a crap about anyone or anything. Maybe one of his one will turn on him...we can only hope...

You would think so but sometimes it seems like most New York City citizens are just sheep.

"Please, tell us what to do, how much to drink and oh yeah, keep a close eye on us because we aren't smart enough to take care of ourselves!"
 
Just because we "can" do something does not mean that we "should'.

None of this technology helps keep us safe, it just makes it a little easier to investigate the crime scene.

We've sold ourt souls for things that are "for the children", "public safety" and "just common sense".

I'd rather risk it and live untethered.
 
Back
Top