• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

Congressional Dems To Inroduce New Anti Gun Bill

carbinemike

Global Moderator
Staff member
Global Moderator
"Philanthropist"
None of this will pass. I think they are trying to make the republicans look bad going into next years elections. How quickly they forget. The '94 assault weapon ban was the reason Bill Clinton lost his democrat controlled congress that year. Many think gun owners were what kept Al Gore out of the white house. I'm not 100% sure why they keep pounding on back ground checks other than it won't make a difference but it's one step closer to registration.

When people lie on the check form it's a federal crime. The prosecution rate for that is below 1%. They brag about the millions of people that the current checks have prevented from getting a gun. Are they that naïve to think a criminal will just give up trying at that point?

Senate Democrats will begin a campaign to combat gun violence on Thursday as party leaders prepare to unveil a sweeping package of legislation that builds on their failed 2013 attempt to require universal background checks for gun purchases, according to senators and aides.
The goal is to have the entire caucus, minus perhaps one centrist Democrat, backing a legislative package aimed at preventing guns from ending up in the hands of the wrong people.
In addition to background checks, Democrats are aiming to add new money for the Justice Department’s existing background checks system that has recently faltered and include provisions to prevent domestic abusers from buying guns, sources familiar with the package said. The measure is also expected to include a proposal from Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) intended to cut down on gun trafficking, sources said.
The package, which will be discussed at a Thursday press conference but is unlikely to be officially introduced this week, also aims to ensure that all key records are sent to a federal database and would make straw purchasing a federal crime.
“We want to solve the problem and not just talk. So we’re putting forward something that’s solid and is supported by 90 percent of the American people,” said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), a leading advocate for stricter gun laws. “The critics of the Congress are right: We’re not doing enough to protect against gun violence, so we’re stepping up to show that we can do it.”
The proposal is not likely to get a vote under the reign of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), but Democrats say the package is intended to show that Democrats are serious about reducing gun deaths but can’t make headway in a Republican Senate. Republicans, led by Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas, are pitching changes to the U.S. mental health system as a preferred way to deal with mass shootings.
Democratic leaders are wary that their rank-and-file could defect and begin supporting the Cornyn bill, which is backed by the National Rifle Association and is not viewed by Democrats as an effective way to combat day-to-day gun violence in big cities like Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore and St. Louis.
“I sense almost a seismic shift in public reaction. It may just be the aftermath of the Oregon shooting but I really do think it will happen,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), referring to the massacre at a community college in Roseburg, Ore., last week. “That point will come. And it may not be everything we want but there will be steps toward gun violence protection.”
Senate Democrats are rallying around three key points: Closing loopholes in the current background checks system, toughening up background checks in general, and shutting down the illegal pipeline of guns.
"All three of these principles would bolster the background check system by strengthening it and stopping those who try to evade it," according to a Dear Colleague letter obtained by POLITICO from Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, who lead the Senate Democrats' policy and messaging arm. "These principles will be a rallying point for a public that is eager for Congressional action, and will be the basis for future legislation that we will demand receive a vote."
Democratic leaders are wary of making the kinds of compromises they did during a 2013 effort to combat gun violence, only to see that measure fall in the face of bipartisan opposition. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid won’t be able to attend the press conference on Thursday morning on the East Front of the Capitol (he is attending a funeral for a former staffer), but he wrote his caucus on Wednesday to urge a strong turnout among Senate Democrats.
“It is within our power to reduce gun violence and prevent mass shootings. Inaction is not an option,” Reid wrote in a separate Dear Colleague letter obtained by POLITICO. “We will again introduce a series of proposals to prevent those who should not have access to a gun from getting one.”
Democrats said that all their members except for Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota are expected to ultimately back the effort. Heitkamp said in an interview she wasn’t familiar with what her colleagues were planning but hasn’t changed her stance since 2013.
“We’ll look at it but I made my position pretty clear on background checks and I don’t plan on changing it,” Heitkamp said.
Heitkamp did support cracking down on straw purchases — where one person buys a firearm for someone else in order to evade gun laws — and gun trafficking in 2013, despite opposing the background checks legislation alongside three other centrist Democrats, all of whom are no longer in the Senate. Another conservative Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, still supports the background checks proposal he devised alongside Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) in 2013, but was not yet familiar with the new, larger package, an aide said.
What’s not clear is whether any Republicans would support the measure or if it would be a purely partisan political exercise. McConnell said on Tuesday that he’d “be taking a look” at Cornyn’s suggestion but aides declined to speculate on any imminent action on the issue. Toomey said in a brief interview that he’s "pursuing all options” to combat gun deaths.
But Toomey, one of the most vulnerable incumbents in the Senate, has not yet reintroduced his proposal with Manchin -- which Democrats view as an opportunity. Now that they are taking the lead, they hope to coax out positions from GOP senators up for reelection, putting them on the defensive as gun violence across the country continues. In addition to Toomey, Sens. Mark Kirk of Illinois, John McCain of Arizona and Susan Collins of Maine supported the 2013 background checks legislation; Kirk and McCain are also up for reelection next year.
Democratic sources said they are unlikely to offer their package as an amendment to unrelated legislation, instead pushing Republicans to either have a wide open gun debate or risk continued Democratic attacks. Republican aides declined to comment on legislation that has not been introduced.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's all talking points.

They don't have to prevent people from doing anything.

They just have to appear to be trying.

If they were wanting to prevent deaths, they could, but in other ways.

They could secure the borders, increase jail terms for violent criminals, as well as other things.

But you won't hear a democrat say any of those are even viable options.
 
Hillary pushed them into it with her "I'll use Executive Orders to control gun crime" BS speech this week..
 
Democrats To Introduce Bill That Could Block All Legal Gun Sales Indefinitely


http://downtrend.com/71superb/democ...finitely?utm_source=fnot3&utm_medium=facebook

A couple of anti-gun democrats (I know, that’s an oxymoron) will introduce a gun control bill that could conceivably deny all future legal gun sales. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy plan to unveil their latest attempt to disarm the American people on Wednesday. The bill, which they call a “modest measure” would allow the feds to delay a background check indefinitely, thus denying law-abiding citizens their 2nd Amendment rights.

Under currently law, a federal background check for a firearms purchase must be completed within 72 hours. If for some reason the feds can’t do a check in three days, it’s up to the discretion of the federally licensed firearms dealer to compete the gun sale or not. Liberals call this a loophole in a law that they wrote and passed and claim that numerous felons and crazy people are exploiting it to get their hands on deadly weapons they shouldn’t have.

Enter Blumenthal and Murphy. The Hill reports that the anti-gun duo will unleash their bill, which would close this 72-hour loophole, letting the feds take their sweet ass time to clear an individual for a firearms transfer.

“Senator Blumenthal and I are going to join together to introduce what we think is a modest measure, to just assure that no guns get sold to people who can’t pass a background check,” said Murphy.

Here’s the problem: the 72-hour time limit is there so the feds can’t drag their ass and deny a person his or her right to purchase a firearm. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is supposed to be instant for a reason.


With the Murphy/Blumenthal bill, the feds could take as long as they like to complete a background check. That means they could take months, years, or for the rest of time, keeping a law-abiding citizen with a clean record from being able to purchase a gun.


Look at it from another way. The NICS is run by the FBI, which is under control of the Justice Department, which answers to the President. Our current President Barack Obama hates guns and private gun ownership. He could simply direct his minions to hold up all background checks in perpetuity and finally achieve his goal of shredding the 2nd Amendment. With the Blumenthal/Murphy bill an anti-gun President could easily deny us our gun rights without having to amend the Constitution.

Martin Luther King jr. said “A right delayed is a right denied” and that’s just what this bill would do.

I think it’s complete bullshit that the democrats are crying about a background check system they put in place. If an instant background check system isn’t instant and not working as it is supposed, then fix it. It’s that simple.

I suspect that the democrats aren’t so much interested in making a more efficient system as they are in coming up with a sneaky backdoor way to annihilate our rights.




 
It's not about the victims of this tragedy....it's about taking away our rights.

Guns are the first right to be targeted, because without them, Citizens have no way to fight back governmental tyranny...by which they then become Subjects.

Every dictator in recent history....whether it be Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao, Gadhafi, Saddam Hussein...

All took away the right to self protection first...after which....all other rights fall like dominos.

The Anti-Christ Obama's agenda is clear...!!
 
Back
Top