As I hear more about this trial, and more info comes forth, I can't help but wonder if Darwin was holding the attacker's hands... I mean, who in their right mind is going to attack someone holding an AR and expect to walkaway unscathed?
It’s pretty clear that the DA did not have good evidence of evil intention on Kyle’s part; but there is plenty of evidence for self-defense, including video tapes that everybody should have seen months ago (but were kept under wraps by somebody for some purpose.)
There’s been so much misbehavior on the part of the state prosecutor that it is likely that Rittenhouse will go free and he will be punished.
In my opinion, there is no minimum age to defend yourself from bodily harm.
As a juror I wouldn’t be able to reconcile why Rittenhouse gets a weapons charge but the prosecution star witness doesn’t get charged for illegally carrying concealed.
And I'll just leave this here to view https://gab.com/tra_jon/posts/107255854955392820
Since i'm a fan of Mr E, i instantly noticedAt first I'm like WTF? It took me a while to "get it". I won't spoil it for the others...
Much the same situation when I grew up. Education is key. We never had the curiosity to play with them because we hunted, shot and were familiar with them.My kids grew up knowing where the guns were/are and how to use them. And that it would be OK to use on an intruder. But they were also told to be discrete and not tell their friends there are guns in the house. No problems, ever...