There is a very real concern over some of the UN stuff as well as other pieces of legislation or ammendments to existing legislation because of the gun/ammunition control wording that appears.
The big concern is that during this "lame duck" session while many law makers are vacationing, legislation will be put through or the UN stuff that simply has to be signed, will in fact be signed by H. Clinton effectively making the US bound to the terms.
So many things are intrinsically linked and the agenda really has to do with global redistribution/socialism.
If the watchdogs aren't payin attention and raisin hell everytime one of these rediculous mandates or otherwise shows up, these things will be put through. The administration is no longer restrianed by havin to appeal to the population for the prospect of reelection. Its done and over with, and as BHO said to Putin or whatever his name is, (I'll paraphrse here) wait till I get reelected, I'll have more flexibility. Following the election, Putin summarily phoned BHO to personally congratulate him. Is this not a reason for concern? When has this ever happened before? When does a communist call a person holding the office of the Presidency to congratulate him?
There are many pieces of legislation already that leaves one wondering, scratching our collective heads tryin to put the pieces together to figure out the ultimate conclusion of it all.
I've said it before, we're livin some sort of Alice in Wonderland reality where everything is upside down and backwards. I don't say what I do to scare anyone or to fuel some sort of mob mentality, but we can't stop watching what is happening in Washington. For example, the UN treaty stuff will absolutely over ride our Constitutional law and rights afforded to us therein. It doesn't have to be voted on to take affect, it only has to be signed. Its supposed to be voted on after bein signed, but someone has to bring it up for a vote but its affective upon signing and the only one who has to sign it is Clinton. I may be wrong on this part but I think it would be Reid who is responsible for bringin it up for a vote. The reason it would be effective immediately upon signing is due to the Venice treaty.
Anyway, put all the pieces together, and without any further clarity or insight into the minds of those responsible for the legislation, we are left to draw our own conclusions. Right or wrong its how our brains work like puttin a puzzle together. Id be happy to compile a list here but much of it is already posted within the political section here.