I am absolutely beside myself livid.
http://news.yahoo.com/us-prepares-1b-aid-package-troubled-ukraine-123023425--politics.html
http://news.yahoo.com/us-prepares-1b-aid-package-troubled-ukraine-123023425--politics.html
The problem with bribing politicians (ours or other countries) is that they don't stay bribed.
WASHINGTON, D.C., March 5, 2014– Today Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel alluded to ensuing American intervention after Russia’s Putin moved to occupy regions of Ukraine last week.
Defense officials confirmed that the U.S. will send six F-15s and one KC-135 to “augment the mission” in Baltic countries.
Here we go...let's ramp the tension up some more...
http://benswann.com/breaking-u-s-military-sends-fighter-jets-to-assist-nato-on-ukraine/
Putin will send in more MiGs...we will send more planes and a couple warships...etc.
Once known as the "Breadbasket of Russia", Ukraine is now also Russia's fuel tank. And, one American company has 10 billion reasons to hope nothing goes wrong.
Ukraine sits on 39 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. That's about one-quarter the world's entire proven reserves. One company that has bet big on Ukraine's natural gas is US-based Chevron.
Back in November 2013, the company signed a 50-year deal with Ukraine's ousted president Viktor Yanukovich. The deal involved developing the Olesska shale gas field with $350 million to $400 million spent on exploratory drilling. The total investment would then go up to $10 billion. Ukraine's then-Energy Minster Stavytsky estimated that as much as 353 billion cubic feet of natural gas could be extracted every year. That translates to roughly $1.7 billion in revenues per year on the upper end given current natural gas prices.
As much as I hate to quote Clausewitz here, it's probably the most referenced quote on the subject: "War is politics by other means". War is politics. It's run by heads of state, who are political. The military is just an instrument to achieve those political ends. Unfortunately, the instrument is not always wielded by those who have the greatest skill.
There are three ways the ruler can bring difficulty to the army:
To order an advance when not realizing the army is in no position to advance, or to order a withdrawal when not realizing the army is in no position to withdraw.
This is called entangling the army.
By not knowing the army's matters, and administering the army the same as administering civil matters, the officers and troops will be confused.
By not knowing the army's calculations, and taking command of the army, the officers and troops will be hesitant.
When the army is confused and hesitant, the neighboring rulers will take advantage.
This is called a confused and hesitant army leading another to victory.
House approved 1 b loan. In less than a week. Funny how long did it take to approve the hurricane sandy relief package for the east coast?
Truth to all. The military is ready and willing to do what is asked of them (within their capabilities) but there is required some sound, solid political guidance to execute as such.Sun Tzu also had some things to say about that
As did Patton: "No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair.", and many others.