Noted..
Hell, I might talk'm down to $45 a piece and buy 3... one AR for everyone in the family! Should fly in the face of the Hillary/Pelosi/Cuomo/Feinstein F*tard crowd!
had that deal with the upper. It was just a QC deal.....I would have lived with the groves inside for a pistol build. If it were a gun i would like to shoot at rang, grouping I would have sent it back on the groves alone because the worst ones were where the barrel extension beds....and you cant see the feed ramp cut hardly
the thing I couldn't live with was my iron sight wouldn't mount flat because the rails were cut so bad, so I definitely didn't want to trust any optic mounted to the rail
I was fine with all of it as I worked a machine shop and know shit happens but they acted offended and didnt give the ol customer is always right. Then I sent some pics and they sent me a label....I got an upper that was much better cut
I understand they were getting all they could from that cutter, or between sharpening but you got to draw the line somewhere even if it is a bargain price part
NOW for the lowers. I hear more people happy than not. I am super picky
I actually ran into an Anderson that had a small issue and it was a weird problem
the follower would activate the bolt catch but the bolt catch would not depress enough to set the bolt manually.....so weird .
It turned out that the plunger hole was not drilled deep enough and the finger pressure wouldn't depress the spring enough......the follower had a different leverage that just allowed lock.
so instead of sending it in we just drilled the hole a touch deeper and it works fine
the only thing I have personally seen with the lower
only other thing was when I had trigger problems , talked to CMC and one of the first things they asked is if it was an Anderson. They stated that they come with inconsistent trigger holes more than any lower they have had to try to make work
